Arbitrated:
- Ohio County Marriages:
- Fixed 6 batches: Mr, Mrs, Miss not indexed
- Fixed 1 batch: Assuming bride’s maiden name from father when it’s not listed anywhere on the record with her name.
- Fixed 2 batches: not watching for complete version of given name
- Fixed 1 batch: using application number instead of page number
- Fixed 1 batch: assuming father’s surname from the bride / groom when there isn’t one listed for the father.
- Fixed 1 batch: l.n.u. means Last Name Unknown. don’t index this.
- Fixed 3 batches: not watching for all surnames for bride.
Indexing Batches done by me and checked today in Arbitration Review:
- Ohio County Marriages:
- Arbitrator assumed since there was a title of Mrs that they had to assume her maiden name. No maiden name was listed on the record. Marked for review. Do not assume maiden name from the father. Done on 4 of the records in the batch where no maiden name was listed.
- Again another batch arbitrator assuming maiden name on 13 records. Marked for review.
- UK Derbyshire Parish Records
- No problems with arbitrator 2 batches in review were 100%.
- US New York 1940 Census
- No problems with arbitrator all were spelling differences and I ignore those and don’t mark for review. Researchers will still find the individuals.
- UK Dorset Parish Records
- No problems with arbitrator; just differences in spelling again I ignore those
- Problem with 1 batch; alias was marked in margin before name of burial and arbitrator removed the “or” and just used the one name. Marked for review.
- Another problem; age on child was clearly readable and arbitrator marked it “unreadable”. Marked for review.
- Next batch was totally my fault. Didn’t realize the year changed part way through and indexed it wrong. Sorry to the arb.
- Next batch is marriage records. Arbitrator didn’t look over all the names and marked me wrong on using “or” for different spelling variations between the 2 different locations on these. Marked for review.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder